IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
VANAMALA GOPI KRISHNA KHAMMAM DIST AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
KANCHARLA BHASKAR RAO KHAMMAM DIST – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5610 of 2017
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed questioning the legality and proprietary of the Order dt.21-09- 2017 in I.A.No.58 of 2017 in O.S.No.76 of 2006 passed by the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, Khammam District.
The petitioners herein/defendants filed a Petition under Order 8 Rule 1A (3) r/w 151 CPC before the trial Court to receive the documents filed along with the petition condoning delay, alleging that respondent herein/plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioners herein and their men from interfering with his peaceful possession of the suit schedule property, while claiming that he is the absolute owner and he is in possession and enjoyment of the same, but the petitioners herein/defendants set up a plea that the plaintiff has no right or title or interest in the schedule property and the sale deed executed by their vendor revealed that originally the property belongs to Maganti Mangaiah. An extent of 290 Sq.yards within the boundaries was purchased by the wife of petitioner No.1/D.1 from three daught
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.