SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2852

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
KUKKALA SATYANARAYANA – Appellant
Versus
KONTHERU GRAM PANCHAYAT AND ANOTHER – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5310 OF 2011

ORDER:

This revision is filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) questioning the order dated 18.02.2009 passed by the Principle Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur in E.A.No.187 of 2006 in E.A.No.62 of 2006 in E.P.No.147 of 2003 in O.S.No.169 of 1990 dismissing the application filed by the petitioner herein, under Section 47 read with Section 151 CPC with a prayer not to record the delivery of item No.2 of the E.P. Schedule property pending disposal of E.A.No.62 of 2006.

The petitioner filed the petition alleging that the first respondent filed the suit against the petitioner and obtained decree and filed execution proceedings for realisation of the decretal amount by sale of E.P. Schedule property. Accordingly, the property was sold in public auction in which the second respondent became highest bidder. While conducting the auction of E.P. Schedule property, the D.Hr.-first respondent played fraud and got conducted the auction. The first respondent has not furnished the value of the property and the J.Dr. value is also not mentioned in the sale papers or proclamation but the property w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top