Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. BALAYOGI, V RAMASUBRAMANIAN, JJ
Tallam Suresh Babu – Appellant
Versus
T.Swetha Rani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's annulment of marriage due to wife's mental condition. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. resisting annulment based on familial agreements and behaviors. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. requirements for annulment under section 12 of the hindu marriage act. (Para 17 , 28) |
| 4. distinction between schizoid and schizophrenia in legal context. (Para 38 , 52) |
| 5. dismissing annulment and confirming restitution of conjugal rights. (Para 53 , 54) |
Common Judgment:
(per V.Ramasubramanian, J.)
Aggrieved by the dismissal of his own petition for annulment of marriage and the grant of a decree for restitution of conjugal rights at the instance of his wife, the husband has come up with the above appeals.
2. We have heard Mr. Y.V.N. Narayana Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant (husband) in both the appeals and Mr. P.Veera Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent (wife).
3. The marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnized on 31-01-2007 according to Hindu customary rites. Within 18 months of the solemnisation of the marriage, the appellant/husband filed a petition in O.P.No.95 of 2008 seeking annulment of the marriage on the ground that the respondent/wife did not all
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
