IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
BINNALA VAJRAM AND 7 ORS – Appellant
Versus
BENDALAM RAMAMURTHY NAIDU AND 3 ORS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs who are two in number, filed the suit in O.S.No.24 of 1989 in the court of Subordinate Judge, Sompet for partition of plaint A schedule property into three equal shares and put the plaintiffs 1 and 2 and D-1 (defendants 4 to 11 are his legal representatives) in separate possession of one such share and for costs of the suit.
2. During pendency of suit, the 1st defendant died and his legal representatives were brought on record as defendants 4 to 11.
3. The suit schedule consists of plaint A and B properties. Plaint ‘A’ schedule is as under:
Vacant dry land situated in Srirampuram village in Siddigam Gram Panchayat in Mandasa Revenue Mandal, measuring about Acs.21-61 cents (Hc.9-152), covered under patta No.164 in S.No.1/1 and ½, bound by:
East: Water channel, South: Srirampuram tank and Government poramboke.
West: Hill North: Plaint ‘B’ Schedule lands” Plaint ‘B’ schedule is as under:
Dry land with cashew-nut and mango trees in Srirampuram village within Siddigam Gram Panchayat in Mandasa Revenue Mandal, covered under patta No.164, S.No.1/2, measuring about Acs.13-04 cents (HC 5.271), bound by:
East: Water channel.
West: Plaint ‘A’ schedule lands.
West: Bellupati road.
Nor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.