SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 4186

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Nakka Chandrakala – Appellant
Versus
Nakka Balaiah – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 607 OF 2011

ORDER:

This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed challenging the order dated 21-12-2010 in M.P.No. 434 of 2010 in M.C.No. 234 of 2004 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court at Visakhapatnam (for short, 'the Court below'), whereby the Court below appointed an advocate commissioner for the specific purpose of taking petitioner No. 2 and the respondent herein to Truth Labs at Hyderabad for getting Deoxyribonucleic Acid (for short, 'DNA') test conducted.

2. The main reason assigned by the respondent is that petitioner No. 1 filed M.C.No. 234 of 2004 on the file of the Court below. In the counter affidavit, the respondent denied the paternity of the minor child-petitioner No. 2 and sought for examination and DNA test to be conducted in Forensic Department at Hyderabad and the said petition was allowed on 16-04-2010. Thereafter, DNA test was not conducted. Therefore, sought for appointment of advocate commissioner to take the respondent and petitioner No. 2 to Truth Labs for conducting DNA test.

3. Petitioner No. 1 filed counter affidavit denying the mater

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top