Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
Boyapati Sudershan Rao – Appellant
Versus
Boyapati Ramkishore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of partition deed and contest on its admissibility. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on the procedural appropriateness of signature comparison. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's review of the admissibility standards and procedural directives. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. clarifications on the trial court's authority regarding admissibility before signature comparison. (Para 14) |
| 5. conclusion of the revision petition with procedural orders. (Para 15) |
ORDER
I have heard Mr.M.S.Srinivasa Iyengar, learned Senior Counsel, on behalf of Mr.Kothacheruvu Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Mr. Md.Imran Khan, learned Senior Counsel, on behalf of Mr.Khamar Kiran Kantamneni, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
2. This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision petitioner/defendant No.1 aggrieved by the order dated 18.06.2025 passed in I.A.No.115 of 2025 in O.S.No.1 of 2021 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Nizamabad.
3. The revision petitioner is respondent No.1/defendant No.1 in I.A. No.115 of 2025 in O.S. No.1 of 2021. The said Interlocutory Application was filed by plaintiff No.2 (respondent No.1 herein) under Section 72
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
