2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 16207
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
AKrS, GMM, JJ
Mr. Jaggannagari Venkat Sai – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
W.P.Nos.24835 and 24837 of 2025
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Judicial Review
Headnote
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aryama Sundaram, Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, Mr. A. Sudershan Reddy
Mr. Aryama Sundaram and Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, learned Senior Counsel, appear for Mr. Jaggannagari Venkat Sai, and Mr. Ponugoti Mohith Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.24835 and 24837 of 2025, respectively.
Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel along with Mr. A. Sudershan Reddy, learned Advocate General for the State of Telangana.
Learned Advocate General submits on instructions that no adverse action based on the findings of the report submitted by the Commission of Inquiry on Kaleshwaram Project (for short, “the Commission”) is, at the present, going to be taken against the petitioners.
However, the matter relating to the irregularities in construction and execution of Kaleshwaram Dam has been referred to the Central Bureau of Investigation on the basis of the reports submitted by the National Dam Safety Authority and other reports.
Two weeks time is allowed to the learned Advocate General to file reply to the instant interlocutory applications.
Let these matters be listed on 07.10.2025 when the pleadings are complete as directed in the previous order dated 22.08.2025.
In the meantime, no adverse action based upon the findings of the Commission’s report be taken against the petitioners till the next date of hearing.