Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B.R. MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J
Balamani – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Nagamani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the civil revision petition against the lower court order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners seek to recall a witness to verify document genuineness. (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. respondents oppose the recall, claiming it's merely an attempt to fill gaps. (Para 5 , 8) |
| 4. the court evaluates if the lower court's order warrants interference. (Para 10 , 11 , 19) |
| 5. court allows petitioners' request for re-examination of dw.1. (Para 18 , 20) |
ORDER
1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 11.08.2023 in IA.No.151 of 2023 in OS.No.54 of 2010 passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge at Mahabubnagar.
2. Petitioners are the plaintiffs and respondents are the defendants in OS.No.54 of 2010 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar.
3. Petitioners-plaintiffs have filed IA.No.151 of 2023 in OS.N.54 of 2010 under Order 18 Rule 17 r/w Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code (for short ‘CPC’) to recall DW.1 (Pandri) for further cross-examination.
4. It is stated in the affidavit (IA.No.151 of 2023) that initially petitioner Nos.1 and 2 filed suit for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property i.e., land admeasuring Acs
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
