Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Amer Ali Nahadi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing proceedings based on vehicle ownership requires factual determination. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides highlight the need for trial regarding allegations. (Para 2) |
| 3. court ruling on not quashing; trial necessary for verified facts. (Para 6) |
| 4. final decision directing trial court to expedite proceedings. (Para 7) |
ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.3641 of 2022 against the petitioner- accused No.1 on the file of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, for the offences under Sections 420 , 468 and 471 IPC.
2. Heard Mr.Aashir M Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and that he borrowed the vehicle from his friend and that he is not the owner of the vehicle. He further submitted that the petitioner was caught while riding the vehicle without driving licence and without number place. The learned counsel further submitted that all these offences are penal provisions and that the penalties are to be collec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
