Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Bandi Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks to quash fir under corruption act. (Para 1 , 9) |
| 2. prosecution asserts evidence for demand and acceptance of bribery. (Para 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. sanction for prosecution discussed. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. evidence evaluated led to dismissal of the petition. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner – accused No.1 seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.21/ACB-KNR/2018 on the file of P.S. ACB, Karimnagar, registered for the offences under Section 7 (a) of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 .
2. Heard the submissions of Sri Dr. G. Srinivasulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T. Bala Mohan, learned Standing Counsel for ACB.
3. The learned petitioner counsel has submitted the allegations against the petitioner are absolutely false and the ingredients do not attract the alleged offences. He further submitted that the scheme is not entrusted to the petitioner and that the entire process of the said scheme was completed prior to the trap laid by the ACB and therefore, there is no iota of truth in the allegations leveled against the petitioner. He further relied upon case of K. Shanthamma Vs. State of Telangana , [2022 Onl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
