SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15472

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
Smt. Banoth. Vanitha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Transfer Criminal Petition No.32 of 2025 | CC.No.917 of 2023 | DVC.No.12 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Shaik Karimulla
For the Respondents: Sri D.Arun Kumar, Sri Rapolu Bhaskar

The convenience of the parties involved can justify the transfer of a criminal case to ensure fair proceedings.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The petition concerns the transfer of a criminal case as per jurisdictional convenience. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought a transfer of CC.No.917 of 2023 after moving to LB.Nagar.

Findings of Court:
The court found transfer necessary for convenience as a related case, DVC.No.12 of 2025, was pending in LB.Nagar.

Issues: The court considered whether the transfer would cause undue hardship to respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized convenience and accessibility for parties involved in the cases.

Result: This Transfer Criminal Petition is disposed of, allowing the transfer.

Table of Content
1. consideration of convenience in transfer of cases. (Para 1 , 4)
2. arguments for and against the transfer. (Para 2)
3. court’s decision on petition based on convenience. (Para 5)

ORAL ORDER:

This Transfer Criminal Petition is filed with a prayer to transfer CC.No.917 of 2023 pending on the file of the III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sessions Division, Warangal District, to the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge cum IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, at LB.Nagar, Medchal Malkajgiri District, where DVC.No.12 of 2025 is pending.

2. Heard Sri Shaik Karimulla, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent No.1 – State, and Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner moved to LB.Nagar, subsequent to lodging of report before Warangal Police Station. He further submitted that no inconvenience would be caused to other side if the CC., is transferred as the accused No.1 is in UK. Therefore, prayed this Court to allow this transfer criminal petition.

4. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for respondents, opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner, contending that it was petitioner herself who lodged complaint before the Warangal Police Station and now filed petition to transfer the same. He further submitted that respondent Nos.3 and 4 are senior citizens and they would face difficulty in attending proceedings if the case is transferred. Therefore, he prayed this Court to dismiss the transfer criminal petition.

5. Upon consideration of the submissions advanced by both learned counsel and on careful examination of the record, it is noted that DVC.No.12 of 2025 is already pending on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge cum IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, at LB.Nagar, Medchal Malkajgiri District. For the convenience of parties, this Court deems it fit to allow this transfer criminal petition.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top