SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 15739

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
Dubba Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition No.27658 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P. Siva Narayana
For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Social Welfare, Government Pleader for Revenue

Court ordered timely resolution of a pending application under a land transfer regulation, highlighting constitutional rights and administrative duty.

Headnote:This Writ Petition seeks a direction for the disposal of a pending application under the Telangana Land Transfer Regulation, 1959, relating to alleged unlawful possession of government land. The petitioner claims violation of constitutional rights due to inaction by authorities. The court found the application pending and directed disposal with a hearing within eight weeks.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of with orders for action on the application.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for action on ltr application. (Para 1 , 3)
2. government's position on application status. (Para 2 , 4)
3. court's observation on the need for timely action. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's directive for disposal of the application. (Para 7)

ORDER:

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 to 5, more particularly respondent No.3, to conduct an enquiry and pass appropriate orders on his pending LTR application No. A/03/2025/CHRL, dated .01.2025, filed under the provisions of the Telangana Land Transfer Regulation , 1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970 (as amended by

1 of 70) Act.

2. Sri P. Siva Narayana, learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare, for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondent Nos.3 to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner belongs to a Scheduled Tribe and is a resident of an agency area. He submits that though the petitioner submitted an application seeking initiation of proceedings under the Land Transfer Regulation (LTR) against respondent No.6, who is alleged to be a non-tribal in unlawful possession of government land in Survey No.

46/5, admeasuring Ac.0.10 cents, House No. 3-78/B, situated in Cherla Village and Mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District, no action has been taken by respondent No.3 despite repeated requests. He submits that the inaction of the authorities amounts to violation of the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, apart from being arbitrary and illegal. He further submits that registration and mutation of names of non-tribals in contravention of the Regulation 1 of 70 is causing grave hardship and insecurity to the Scheduled Tribes residing in the agency area, who are mostly landless poor.

4. On the other hand, learned Government Pleaders appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner’s application is under consideration and necessary action will be taken in accordance with law within a reasonable period.

5. Having heard both sides and perused the material on record, this Court finds that the grievance of the petitioner is only with regard to the non-disposal of his pending LTR application. Admittedly, the said application is still pending consideration before respondent No.3.

6. Since the issue pertains to alleged violation of the mandatory provisions of the Telangana Land Transfer Regulation , 1959 as amended by Regulation 1 of 1970, it is just and proper that the competent authority considers the petitioner’s application and passes appropriate orders in accordance with law within a stipulated time.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s pending LTR application No. A/03/2025/CHRL, dated .01.2025, after affording opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top