IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
RENUKA YARA, J
Kapula Sebastian – Appellant
Versus
Bhukya Bicha – Respondent
Order:
This is a Civil Revision Petition preferred by the petitioner/petitioner/defendant aggrieved by the order 05.07.2024 passed by the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Kothagudem in favour of respondent/respondent/
plaintiff in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.44 of 2019.
2. Heard Sri Subba Rao Vadrevu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Sureddy Priyanka, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.
3. The petitioner herein filed a petition under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to refer the promissory note dated 02.08.2016 to a handwriting expert for comparison with admitted signatures on vakalath and written statement.
4. The respondent herein filed a suit for recover of money on the basis of pronote dated 02.08.2016 which according to the petitioner herein is a forged document. The said document is not supported by consideration and the signature therein is a forged signature. The petitioner denied acquaintance with respondent, denied his signature on the promissory and therefore, sought the comparison of signature on promissory note with admitted signatures on vakalath and written statement. Said petition was opposed by the respondent herein allegi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.