Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Vaibhav Bajirao Dhage – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir filed under bns and it act against accused. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments concerning wrongful prosecution without company involvement. (Para 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. investigation should not be interfered with prematurely. (Para 5) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners – accused seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.569 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Cyber Crimes, Rachakonda, registered for the offences under Sections 316 (2), 319(2), 318(4), 338 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS, 2023”) and Section 66-C , 66-D Information and Technology Act-2000-2008 (for short “IT Act”).
2. Heard the submissions of Sri Raghu Gurram, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State.
3. The learned petitioner counsel has submitted that the allegations of prosecution against the petitioners are false and that the company of the petitioners itself is the victim and that their company is into business of imports and exports of agricultural items and that no prima-facie offences are made out against the petitioners. The ingredients of the offences i.e., Section 316 (2) do
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
