Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
Siddamoni Poojitha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition pertains to dowry harassment and previous complaint handling. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments pertaining to the closure of previous complaints and fir registration. (Para 4) |
| 3. court observations on procedural directions and rights under ipc and dp act. (Para 5) |
| 4. final verdict disposing the writ petition based on discussed observations. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.2/Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate in not giving necessary orders to the 3rd respondent herein pursuant to the complaint dated 11.08.2025, for taking action against the un-official respondents basing on the complaint dated 16.07.2025 which was closed, without assigning any reasons as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and seeking a consequential direction to 2nd respondent to issue necessary orders pursuant to the complaint dated 11.08.2025.
3. The facts in brief are that the petiti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
