Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
N.Sudhakar Chary – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks to declare respondent action illegal. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner claims ownership via orc and assessments of appeal timelines. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents challenge the petitioner’s ownership assertion. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. previous case law not applicable due to factual differences. (Para 7) |
| 5. court directs the framing of a preliminary issue on limitation. (Para 8 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. limitation requirements for appeal under relevant statutes. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No.3 in entertaining/adjudicating the appeal vide File No.F1/218/2023, dated 17.06.2023, filed by respondent Nos.6 to 9 under the Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, 1955 , as illegal and against the principles of natural justice.
2. Heard Sri Padala Pravin Kumar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 and Sri A.Abhinandan Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K.Raghavender Reddy, learned counsel-on-record for respondent Nos.6 to 9.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
