Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
Thathireddy Srinivasa Reddy AND 6 others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 5 others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishes grounds for writ petition regarding false entries. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. addresses requirement for formal application in administrative processes. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's decision on procedural fairness and rights to benefits. (Para 5) |
ORDER :
The present writ petition is filed by the petitioners for the following relief :
“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents mentioning in Dharani Portal that “there is a court stay/injunction or court order” under transaction status in the Dharani Portal in respect of petitioners respective lands and stopping the benefit of Rythu Bandhu from the year 2022 without there being any court stay/injunction or court order in respect of the petitioners respective lands, without issuing any prior notice, is illegal and arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove the mentioning of Court stay or injunction order under the heading of transaction status in the Dharani Portal and release the financial assistance
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
