Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Shivananad Bhajanthri. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF TELANGANA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for quashing of an fir under jurisdiction issues. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdictional validity of the fir. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. explaining zero fir registration and procedural requirements. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision on fir registration and transfer. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners – accused Nos.1 to 5 seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.118 of 2025 on the file of P.S. WPS South East Zone, Hyderabad, registered for the offences under Sections 85 , 351(2) of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short “ BNS , 2023”) and Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (for short “DP Act”).
2. Heard the submissions of Sri Syed Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the place of offence is in the State of Karnataka, and that the Police herein do not have any jurisdiction to register the FIR. Hence, the registration of FIR itself is not proper and therefore, prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prose
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
