Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Ekitam kadem Yadagiri – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership dispute and allegations of encroachment. (Para 1 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments concerning the nature of the proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court observations on the sufficiency of prima facie evidence. (Para 5) |
| 4. pendency of civil proceedings does not prevent criminal action. (Para 8) |
| 5. final ruling on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners – accused seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR No.726 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Rajendranagar, Cyberabad, registered for the offences under Sections 3 29 (3), 324(4), 132 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNS, 2023”) and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 .
2. Heard the submissions of Sri B.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Erigi Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the owners of the property to an extent of Ac.01-33 guntas in suvey No.16 and that there is a dispute with boundary wall and that the HYDRAA has issued notice to the petitioners and that they have replied stating that they a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
