Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
MOHD. AFZAL – Appellant
Versus
PRL. SECY. HOME DEPT. AND 2 ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's complaint requires police action. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. court hears arguments regarding petitioner's grievance. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. legal precedent requires proper judicial process before writ. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. petition dismissed; proper remedies encouraged. (Para 9 , 10) |
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-
“…to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not extending the necessary protection to the petitioner and not registering any case against the persons named in the report dated 14.07.2016 in respect of the house bearing no.12- 11-1474/A/2 admeasuring 100 Sq., Yards in Survey No.168 situated at Warasiguda, Opp. Jamina Osmania Railway Station, Zamistanpur, Secunderabad as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law in the interest of justice and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case…”
2. None appears for the petitioner.
3. I have heard Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
