Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J
Smt. Arifa Sultana – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to suspension order under article 226. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. counsel submissions regarding legality of suspension. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive for timely review of suspension. (Para 5) |
| 4. final decision to dispose of the writ petition. (Para 6) |
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare the action of respondent No.3/District Collector in issuing proceedings vide No.A2/561/2023-1, dated 30.09.2023 and placing the petitioner under suspension and continuing her under suspension without revoking as illegal, biased and arbitrary.
2. Heard Sri Banda Prasada Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Services-I appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner was working as Tahsildar and Joint Sub Registrar in Mavala Mandal of Adilabad District, she was placed under suspension on 30.09.2023 vide No.A2/561/2023-1 in connection with an ACB case registered vide FIR No.04/ACB-ADB/2023, dated 24.09.2023, on the file of the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Adilabad Range. Thereafter, the said suspension was reviewed from time to time and f
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
