Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
M/s.Innovative Industries – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition initiated under article 226 challenging tender conditions. (Para 1) |
| 2. tender criteria may violate fairness principles. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. response to representations in tender processes. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. importance of impleading parties in tender disputes. (Para 7) |
| 5. dismissal of writ petition based on standing. (Para 8) |
ORDER:
The present writ petition has been filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking to set aside the tenders dated 05.05.2025 issued by respondent Nos.3 and 4.
2. Heard Sri P.V. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. Vanga Anita, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Tribal Welfare Department, for the respondents.
3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a reputed firm engaged in the business of supplying Reverse Osmosis (RO) water purification systems and has been actively operating in the State of Telangana. Though the said tender notifications were dated 05.05.2025, the same were uploaded only on 07.05.2025 at 9:00 P.M., thereby curtailing the effective bidding window. He submits that the eligibility and technical criteria sti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
