Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
Nokala Madan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana rep.by the Principal Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition seeks police action against respondents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. restrained from invoking article 226 due to alternative remedies. (Para 4) |
| 3. court reiterates the requirement for pursuing statutory remedies. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief/s:-
“…to issue an order writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent police in not taking the action against the respondent Nos.3 and 4 even though the petitioner approached the 2nd respondent police and requested to take action in accordance with law but no response from the 2nd respondent police is illegal and arbitrary…”
2. I have heard Mr. M.K. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Laxmikanth Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that respondent No.2 failed to register the crime against respondent Nos.3 and 4. Consequently, learned counsel prays for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Station House Officer-respondent No.2 to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
