Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for quashment based on allegations and existing injunction. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. ongoing investigations require thorough examination of both parties' claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court directs cooperation during the investigation. (Para 6) |
| 4. petition disposed, leading to closure of pending miscellaneous petitions. (Para 7) |
ORDER:
This petition is filed seeking quashment of the Crime No.186 of 2025 on the file of Nagarkurnool Police Station, Nagarkurnool District, against the petitioner/accused.
2. Heard Mr.K.Karuna Sagar, learned counsel for petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is a bona fide purchaser and that he has ad-interim injunction orders against respondent No.2. However, the Police have again registered a case against him at the instance of respondent No.2. Hence, prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition, submitting that cases and counter cases have been registered against each other between the de facto complainant and the petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
