Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
Gunti Srikanth – Appellant
Versus
D. Arun Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the factual background of the appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion of evidence and arguments regarding caste status. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the trial court's findings and merit of the appeal. (Para 6 , 7) |
JUDGMENT :
The present criminal appeal is preferred by the appellant/
complainant aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.01.2014 in Special SC No.01 of 2011 on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad wherein and whereby the said Court while acquitting the accused/2nd respondent for the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of SCs & STs (POA) Act found him guilty for the offence punishable under Section 506 Part-I of IPC, convicted under Section 235(2) of Cr.P.C., and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months.
2. Heard Sri K.Rama Subba Rao learned counsel for the appellant, Sri E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1/State and Sri Y.Subhash, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on the evening of
13.11.2010 at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
