Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J
Mr. Josef Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. key facts concerning the complaint and the accused. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding the complaint. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court observations on the adequacy of complaint details. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal standards and interpretations regarding the offences. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final court decision to quash the charges. (Para 16) |
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short ‘ BNSS ’) by petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 to quash the proceedings against them in Cr.No.286 of 2025 of Vanasthalipuram Police Station. The offences alleged against petitioners are under Sections 316 (2), 318(4), 351(2) and 352 read with 3(5)
of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short ‘ BNS ’).
2. Heard Mr. Parsa Ananth Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Surepalli Prashanth, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State. There is no representation on behalf of respondent No.2.
Perused the material on record.
3. A memo is filed by learned counsel for petitioners stating that personal notice was taken out on respondent No.2 through Registered Post Acknowledgemen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
