Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent Nos.1 to 3 – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of civil revision petition and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of the cases and procedural progress. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments presented by both parties regarding the necessity of the amendment. (Para 9) |
| 4. court's discussion on the necessity of amendments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. conclusion and the order issued by the court. (Para 14) |
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing Order dated
21.12.2023 in I.A.No.2266 of 2023 in O.S.No.111 of 2010, passed by the XXVI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC r/w Rule 28 of Civil Rules of Practice was dismissed.
2. Heard Sri N.Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Srinivas Goud, learned Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
3. Petitioner herein is defendant No.2, respondent Nos.1 to 3 are plaintiffs and respondent No.4 is defendant No.1 in the suit.
4. Brief facts of the case which led to filing of the present revision petition are that respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed a suit vide O.S.No.111 of 2010, against the petitioner and respondent No.4 for partition and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
