Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks transfer of family court case due to hardship. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner has faced harassment post-marriage. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. transfer request based on distance and convenience. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court declines to transfer but grants travel expense support. (Para 7) |
| 5. orders for travel expenses and cooperation in proceedings. (Para 8) |
| 6. court disposes of the petition without transfer. (Para 9) |
ORDER:
This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to transfer F.C.O.P.No.1649 of 2024, pending on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Vikarabad.
2. Heard Ms.Akula Sunitha, learned counsel for petitioner and there is no representation on behalf of the respondent, despite service of notice. Therefore, the matter is being disposed of basing on the material available on record.
3. The brief facts of the case, shorn-off unnecessary details, required for adjudication of this Tr.C.M.P., as averred in the affidavit filed in support of the Tr.C.M.P., are that petitioner and respondent are wife and husband and their marriage was performed on 21.11.2021, at Bhukailas Temple, Antar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
