Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
K.Anjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's innocence and incorrect designation. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of the complaint. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. key issues framed by the court. (Para 3) |
| 4. court's findings on the case details. (Para 6) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner – accused No.2 seeking to quash the FIR No.110 of 2025 on the file of P.S. Mahabubnagar Rural, Mahabubnagar District, registered for the offences under Sections 167 , 464, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(f)(g) of SC/ST POA Act .
2. Heard the submissions of Sri I.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Shalini Saxena, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 – State.
3. The allegations are under Sections 167 , 464, 420 of the Indian Penal Code along with Section 3(1)(f)(g) of SC/ST POA Act , the notice was served on the respondent No.2/de facto complainant through the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor at the address available but the notice is returned as ‘person left this address’. Hence, it is deemed service.
4. The learned petitioner counsel has submitted that the date of alleged offence is 25.08.2018 and that the FIR is registered on 18.02.202
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
