Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
Thota Sri Priya – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial order and parties' arguments about maintenance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. explains the contention regarding maintenance amounts and evidence submissions. (Para 7) |
| 3. clarifies the financial demands of petitioners based on the husband's us salary. (Para 8) |
| 4. court's reliance on established principles for maintenance. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. final judgment directing specific maintenance amounts. (Para 12 , 13) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed to set aside the order dated 30.01.2025 passed in Crl.R.P.No.03 of 2024 in Crl.M.P.No.133 of 2023 in M.C.No.05 of 2023 by the Principal District & Sessinos Judge at Medak (for short “Sessions Court”).
2. Heard the submissions of Sri B.Chinnapa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri N.Venkataiah, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
3. The learned petitioners counsel has submitted that the Sessions Court ought not to have interfered with the orders passed by the Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narsapur, Medak District (for short “trial Court”) granting interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/- per month to the petitioners herein, while it is reduced to an extent of Rs.15,000/- per m
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
