Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N. TUKARAMJI, J
Parelli Rama Krishna – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case establish procedural context. (Para 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. arguments address the admissibility challenges by the petitioner. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence law. (Para 5) |
| 4. court observations outline key ruling principles regarding evidence. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. no impropriety found in the trial court's order. (Para 17) |
| 6. final outcome of dismissal preserves rights of the petitioner. (Para 18) |
ORDER
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘the BNSS ’) challenging the order dated 18.11.2024 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1225 of 2024 in M.C.No.3 of 2020 on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kodad.
2. I have heard Mr. S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State and Mr.
C.Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3.
3. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the respondents No.2 and 3, i.e., the wife and daughter of the present petitioner, initiated maintenance proceedings by filing M.C. No. 3 of 2020 before the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
