Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J
BHUKYA KHANNA ADILABAD. – Appellant
Versus
ASST. SECURITY COMMISSIONER AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner's disciplinary action was based on distinct charges. (Para 2 , 8 , 10) |
| 2. overview of the disciplinary actions and charges. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments presented revolved around natural justice and procedural fairness. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. prior outcomes and similarities between criminal and departmental charges were assessed. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 5. court's affirmation of the procedural validity and independence of charges. (Para 7) |
| 6. reference to specific rules guiding the disciplinary proceedings. (Para 9) |
| 7. final judgment on the effect of acquittal on departmental proceedings. (Para 11) |
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed having been aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in denying the past service vide impugned order dated 12.01.2005, while modifying the punishment imposed upon the petitioner by respondent No.2 vide proceedings dated 07.09.2004.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially appointed as a Railway Police Force (RPF) Constable on 19.04.1995, and while working as such, he was placed under suspension vide order dated 05.10.2002, on the grounds that he was involved in a criminal case vide Crime No.392 of 2002, registered for the offense punisha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
