Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
S S Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations involve serious offences under the bharatiya nyaya sanhita, 2023. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the validity of the gpa and claims of false implication. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court emphasizes ongoing investigations and dismisses the petition. (Para 7 , 8) |
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners-A.1 to A.3 in FIR No.400 of 2025 dated 18.04.2025 on the file of XIV Additional metroplitan Magistrate, Prashanth Nagar, Cyberabad, at Kukatpally. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 3 18 (4), 329 (3), 338, 336(3), 340(2) r/w.3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The facts of the case are that a complaint was filed by the defacto complainant - 2nd respondent against the petitioners alleging that on 17.04.2025, at 6:30 pm, petitioner No.1/accused No.1 - S.S. Raju and his gang of over 10 people, including petitioner Nos.2 to 3, forcefully tried to trespass into their lands in Shamshiguda Village and stopped them from site cleaning work and threatened them. The complainant stated that Raju had previously been given a General Power of Attorney (GPA) in 2014 to look
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
