IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
PULLA KARTHIK, J
Sri Vivek Jain – Appellant
Versus
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for service-related reliefs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by parties. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence and procedural fairness. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling directing continuity of service. (Para 9) |
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned Award dt: 25- 01-2005 on the file of the 2nd respondent to the extent of denying back wages to the petitioner and continuity of service and directing that, the reinstatement of the petitioner shall be treated as fresh appointment, as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequential direct the 1st respondent to pay the back wages along with continuity of service to the petitioner and pass such other order/s as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case…”
2. Heard Ms.Sunita Nawandar, learned counsel representing Sri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana State Road Transport Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.