Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Bura Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana And 4 Others – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims on service benefits and previous administrative orders. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. importance of compliance with orders for issuance of service benefits. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's direction for respondents to act on petitions within a specified timeframe. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER:
Heard petitioner appearing as party-in-person and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I I appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. The petitioner appearing as party-in-person approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 1 to 3 for not granting service benefits like special increments promotion regularization of suspension period with full pay, as illegal and arbitrary and is in violation of Article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently implement the Order in O.A. No. 6489 of 2010 and pass…”
3. The petitioner through I .A.No.01 of 2025 sought permission of this Court to make submissions as party-in- person and the same had been ordered, accordingly as prayed for.
4. The case of the petitioner in brief as pe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
