IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. SAM KOSHY, J
J. Om Prakash – Appellant
Versus
K. Indravati – Respondent
COMMON ORDER :
Since the issue arising out of the instant Civil Revision Petitions is one and the same, they are being heard and decided by this Common Order.
2. Heard Mr.Venkatram Reddy Mantur, learned counsel for the petitioner in Civil Revision Petition No.3163 of 2025, Ms.Pratusha Bopanna, learned counsel for the petitioner in Civil Revision Petition No.3243 of 2025; and Mr. R.A. Achuthanand, learned counsel for the respondents in both the Revisions.
3. The instant Civil Revision Petitions have been filed by the petitioners assailing the order dated 29.07.2025 in Interlocutory Application No.2288 of 2024 in O.S.No.298 of 2015 passed by the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad (for short, the ‘impugned order’)
4. The above I.A. was filed by respondent No.1 (plaintiff) herein under Section 148 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 praying the Trial Court to condone the delay of thirty-one (31) days in complying with the order dated 05.11.2024 in I.A.Nos.471 and 472 of 2024 passed by the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.
5. Vide the impugned order, the Trial Court allowed the above application and condoned the delay of (31) days in complying with t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.