Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J
Smt. Binde BharathiDIED – Appellant
Versus
Smt N. Indira – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the context of plaintiffs' claims and ownership of property. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the necessity of impleading the cantonment board. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the absence of necessity for the board's involvement. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. final decision on the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 26.03.2024 passed in IA.No.1395 of 2023 in O.S.No.47 of 2018 on the file of the XII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, whereunder the application filed under Order I Rule 10 CPC to implead the proposed respondent No.6 as defendant No.6 in the suit was dismissed.
2. Heard Sri S.Malla Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri K.Venu Madhav, learned counsel for respondent No.1, Sri M.Mehboob Ali, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Sri G.P.Yashvardhan learned counsel for respondent No.4.
3. The revision petitioners are plaintiffs and respondent Nos.1 to 5 are defendant Nos.1 to 5, respectively, in the suit. For convenience, hereinafter, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.
4. The suit was origin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
