Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Mohammed Rafiuddin Memorial Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
Osmania University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inaction on affiliations despite regulatory compliance (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. timeliness and necessity of response to representations (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's directive for decision-making within a specified timeframe (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER:
Heard Sri A.Bhuvan Sunder Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Osmania University appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and the learned Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2.
2. The petitioners approached the Court seeking prayer as under:
“…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus:
a) Declaring the action of Respondents in not permitting the Petitioner Institution from running and offering the course of B.Ed., with an intake of 100 seats for the Academic Year 2025-26 despite the Petitioner Institution having the necessary faculty, facilities and infrastructure for the same as being arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and set aside the same.
b) Consequently, direct the Respondents herein to treat the Petitioner Institution as a validly affiliated
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
