Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. SAM KOSHY, SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, JJ
Rikkala Rajaiah – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition seeks relief based on jurisdiction of civil courts. (Para 2) |
| 2. court discusses applicability of ibc provisions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. previous court decisions affirm the current legal position. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court directs civil court to entertain insolvency filings. (Para 8) |
| 5. writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Para 9) |
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.29658 OF 2025 ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Mr.K.V.Subba Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.B.Narasimha Sharma, learned Additional Solicitor General representing Mr.Angothu Nehru, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2. The instant Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the concerned Civil Court for not entertaining the Insolvency petition filed by the petitioners under the Provincial Insolvency Act , 1920 by the petitioners is without jurisdiction and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
