SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TS) 5678

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J
Etela Rajendar – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
WP/8747/2024



The mere pendency of criminal cases cannot justify the refusal to renew a passport as per established legal principles.

Headnote:(A) Passports Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(f) - Writ of Mandamus sought for renewal of passport denied due to pending criminal cases - Court held that mere pendency of cases cannot be the sole ground for refusal, referencing established legal precedents - The petitioner, an Ex-MLA, applied for renewal of his passport which was denied based on adverse police verification. - (Paras 1-6)

(B) Legal Principles - Authority cannot refuse passport renewal solely based on pending criminal cases; established principles of natural justice must be observed.

(C) Findings of Court - The court directed the Passport Officer to reconsider the application upon submission of an undertaking regarding cooperation with the trial.

(D) Issues - The core issue was whether the refusal to renew the passport based on pending criminal cases was lawful. (E) Ratio Decidendi - The court emphasized that the passport authority must follow the procedure established by law, allowing for renewal subject to conditions. (F) Result - Writ petition disposed of with directions for reconsideration of the application.

ORDER

This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:

    “…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not renewing Petitioner's Passport bearing No.Z2846452 pursuant to the application vide File Number HYDO76220782724 dated 02-02-2024 on the ground of pending Criminal Cases vide 1) Crime No.199/2021 PT at IV AddL.JFCM Hanmakonda, 2) Crime No.198/2021 PT Vide CC No.7753/2021 at IV Addl.JFCM Hanmakonda, 3) Crime No.215/2021 PT Vide CC No.647/23 at IV Addl.JFCM Hanmakonda, 4)Crime No.217/2021 PT, 5) Crime No.220/2021 PT, 6) Crime No.79/2021 PT Vide CC No.7081/22,

7) Crime No.315/2021 CC.No.466/2022 at Spl.JFCM Excise Court, Hyd., 8) Crime No.316/2021 CC.No.470/2022 at Spl.JFCM Excise Court, Hyd., 9) Crime No.329/2021 at Spl.JFCM Excise Court, Hyd., 10) Crime No.316/2021 Case is PT for app of Accused at Spl.JFCM Excise Court, Hyd., 11) Crime No.30/2013 The case was prosecution withdrawal U/sec.321 Cr.p.c on 09/10/2020 vide Spl SC No.84/2018 in Hon'ble Spl Sessions Court, Nampally., 12)Crime No.222/2021 For summons at Hon'ble JMFC Courts, Karimnagar, 13) Crime No.356/2021 PT Vide CC No.470/22 at 11 Addl.JFCM Huzurabad, 14) Crime No.252/2012 the Case was prosecution withdrawal on 04-10- 2017 by the Hon'ble JFCM Rlys KZJ court vide CC No.78/2017 vide G.O.R.T.No.558 Law., 15) Crime No.251/2012, the Case was prosecution withdrawal on 04-10-2017 by the Hon'ble JFCM Rlys KZJ court vide CC No.77/2017 vide G.O.R.T.No.558 Law., as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of the Passports Act 1967 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew petitioner's Passport bearing No.Z2846452 for 10 years pursuant to the application No.HYDO76220782724 dated 02-02-2024 without reference to the said criminal cases..”.

2. It is the case of petitioner that he is an Ex-MLA and he holds Indian Passport bearing No.Z2846452, which is valid upto 15.06.2024. It is further case of the petitioner that to renew his passport, he submitted an application No.HYD076220782724, dated 02.02.2024 before the respondent No.2 through online but the respondent No.2, instead of renewing the passport, issued a letter dated 07.02.2024 and refused to renew the passport on the ground that an adverse police verification report was received against the petitioner about his involvement in the following cases:

    S.No. Crime No. CC.No. Name of PS Name of the Court 1 199/2021 PS Kamalapur IV Addl. JFCM Hanamkonda 2 198/2021 PS Kamalapur IV Addl. JFCM Hanamkonda 3 215/2021 PS Kamalapur IV Addl. JFCM Hanamkonda 4 217/2021 PS Kamalapur 5 220/2021 PS Kamalapur 6 79/2021 PS Kamalapur 7 315/2021 PS Jammukunta Spl JFCM Excise Court, Hyd 8 316/2021 PS Jammukunta Spl JFCM Excise Court, Hyd 9 329/2021 PS Huzurabad Spl JFCM Excise Court, Hyd 10 317/2021 PS Huzurabad Spl JFCM Excise Court, Hyd 11 316/2021 PS Huzurabad Spl JFCM Excise Court, Hyd 12 30/2013 GRP Kazipet 13 222/2021 PS Karimnagar II Town in Pending Trial 14 356/2021 PS Jammikunta II Addl. JFCM Huzurabad 15 252/2012 RPS Mancherial 16 251/2012 RPS Mancherial

 

3. Considered the rival submissions of respective counsel and perused the record.

4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cases registered against the petitioner relate to election offences and mere pendency of criminal cases against the petitioner cannot be a ground to deny renewal of passport to the petitioner and the said action of the respondents is contrary to the procedure laid down under the Passports Act, 1967. It is the further contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in catena of judgments, the Hon’ble Apex Court as well as this Court held that “passport authority cannot refuse renewal of the passport on the ground of pendency of criminal case and directed the passport authority

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top