HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Khethavath Sandeep Nayak – Appellant
Versus
The Chief General Manager – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Ms. Preethya Swarnalatha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.V. Ramana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents. 2. The petitioner approached this Court with the following prayer: “ ..... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in freezing the petitioner account No 867810110016891 for day to day transaction and activation of ATM Cards cheques basing on the Cyber crime false complaint No. 23708230032990 using word Cyber is illegal arbitrary contrary to the Banking Rules made there under and consequently direct the respondents forthwith activate the petitioner Bank account and ATM Cards cheque day to day transactions and pass such other order or orders as the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that one Devarla Sangeeth Kumar lodged a cyber crime complaint against one Keerthi and the bank has freezed the petitioner’s account with all transactions. As the petitioner had contacts with the said SN, J WP_27758_2023 Keerthi, the respondent bank freezed the ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.