HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Bochala Enoch Sandy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. Asad Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard learned counsel representing Mr.Gadi Praveen Kumar, Dy. Solicitor General of India, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. The case of the petitioner in brief as per the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present writ petition is that, the petitioner herein had applied for issuance of passport vide online application bearing No.HY2065430830723 to respondent No.2 along with all the requisite documents and fees prescribed.
It is further the case of the petitioner that on 02.08.2023, the respondent No.2 issued a letter vide reference No.SCN/315410001/23, dated 02.08.2023 seeking clarification in reference to petitioner’s involvement with respect to F.I.R.No.897 of 2021 registered against the petitioner under Sections 427, 182, 183, 184, 187, 205, 201, 279, 337 IPC read with 34 of IPC of Narsingi P.S., Cyberabad, and police had filed charge sheet vide C.C.No.4451 of 2021 and the same is pending on the file of XVI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Rajender Nagar, Cyberabad in which the petitioner herein is arrayed as Accused
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.