HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
CHADA VENKAT REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SATISHKUMAR VODITHELA and 14 others – Respondent
ORDER
Heard Mr. C. Damodar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. C. Ruthwik Reddy, learned counsel for Election Petitioner, Mr. M.P. Chandramouli, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Y. Rama Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - Returned Candidate, Mr. K. Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.7 and Mr. J. Damodar, learned counsel for respondent No.8.
2. This Election Petition is filed by the Election Petitioner under Sections - 80, 81 and 83 read with 100 (1) (d) (i) (iv) and 125(A) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, seeking the following reliefs:-
| 12. However, in the affidavit filed by respondent No.1 along with |
| 12. However, in the affidavit filed by respondent No.1 along with |
3. Election to 32-Husnabad Assembly Constituency (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.