IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. SAM KOSHY, SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, JJ
Revenue – Appellant
Versus
assessee – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for tax set-off (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. analysis of manufacturing evidence (Para 7 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. verdict on the appeal (Para 9 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. application of precedent in the ruling (Para 14 , 15) |
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO TREVC.No.202 of 2009 O R D E R: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Suddala Chalapathi Rao)
The present Tax Revision Case is filed assailing the orders of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad(AP) (for short ‘the STAT’), in TA.No.12 of 2008, dt.05.05.2009.
2. Heard Sri T.Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for State Tax appearing for the petitioner/Revenue. None appeared for the respondent/assessee, though notices were served.
3. The brief facts of the case are that, the respondent/assessee is the Dealer on the Rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Suryapet; that the respondent/assessee is the manufacturer of Thermocole sheets. Though the respondent/assessee entitled for setoff under G.O.Ms.No.574, dt.09.06.1987, issued under the provisions of APGST Act , (for short ‘the Act’) on the turnover of ‘Thermocole’, the assessing authority vide its order, dt.27.0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.