IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Ramavadh – Appellant
Versus
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission I – Respondent
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.32420 of 2025 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar
1. The present Writ Petition is filed assailing the order passed in I.A.No.122 of 2025 in C.C.No.567of 2022 dated 11.09.2025 by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Commission’) in dismissing the Interlocutory Application filed for reopening, receiving, recalling and for cross examining the Expert evidence, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. The facts reveal that the petitioners approached the learned Commission claiming compensation from the respondents to the tune of Rs.5,60,25,936/- towards Medical negligence for causing the death of the petitioners’ son Surya Pratap Bharathi.
3. The petitioners are the parents of Surya Pratap Bharathi, who suffered brain stroke at the age of 30 years and succumbed to medical negligence of the respondent Nos.2 to 6 herein.
4. Pending adjudication of C.C.No.567 of 2022 by the learned Commission, the petitioners filed I.A. No.66of 2024 for reopening the evidence and to examine P.W.5, and the same was allowed. But the petitioners herein could not p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.