Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
M/s. Sarosh Shipping India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Vijai Electricals Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the commercial dispute concerning electronic records. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. requirements for admissibility of electronic evidence under section 65b. (Para 7 , 8 , 21) |
| 3. arguments regarding procedural shortcomings in evidence provision. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 24) |
| 4. conclusion directing expediency in trial court proceedings. (Para 25 , 27 , 28) |
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR C.R.P. Nos.634 and 635 of 2019 COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Justice Gadi Praveen Kumar Since, the present Civil Revision Petitions arise out of common order out of same suit, being disposed of by this common order.
2. C.R.P.Nos.634 of 2019 and 635 of 2019 are filed being aggrieved by the common order dated 29.01.2019 passed by the learned Commercial Court for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes at Hyderabad in I.A.No.969 of 2018 and I.A.No.970 of 2018 respectively in C.O.S.No.56 of 2018.
3. Heard Sri A.Venkatesh, learned Senior Counsel for M/s.Phillix Law Firm representing Sri Md. Nawaz Hyder Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.Venkateswara Rao, learned counsel for Sri M.V.Durga Prasad, learned counsel appearing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
