Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SMT. RENUKA YARA, J
Sri. Chetluru Sreenivas – Appellant
Versus
Ms. C.Suneethamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance amounts granted by the trial court challenged for reasonableness. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. both parties presented inflated financial situations. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court noted the discrepancies in reported incomes. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 4. the principle of res judicata applied to maintenance claims. (Para 14) |
| 5. revised maintenance amount representation. (Para 17) |
ORDER
Heard Sri. Chetluru Sreenivas, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri. T.Ravinder Babu, learned counsel on behalf of Ms. C.Suneethamma, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 as well as learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.4. Perused the record.
2. The present Criminal Revision Case is filed against the impugned order dated 08.08.2024 passed in M.C. No. 182 of 2020 by the learned I Additional Family Court-cum-XIV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Court, Hyderabad (for short, ‘the trial Court’), wherein, the trial Court partly allowed the M.C. by granting monthly maintenance amount of Rs.30,000/- to respondent No. 2 herein and Rs.50,000/- to respondent No.3 herein, who are children of revision petitioner (husband) and respondent No.1 (wife).
3. Respondent No.1 is the wife
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
