SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 21000

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TIRUMALA DEVI EADA, J
B.Praveen – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP/15283/2025



THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15283 of 2025

ORDER

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 in Crime No.496 of 2024, on the file of Hayathnagar Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC.

2. Heard Sri C.Sharan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 as well as Sri Jitender Rao Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has restricted his submission stating that a direction be issued to the Police to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’).

4. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 is less than seven (07) years and has sought for directions to the Police to proceed with investigation by issuing notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’).

5. Perused the record. The allegations leveled against the petitioners pertain to the offences under Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, which attracts punishment of less than seven years. Hence, without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 11.12.2025 between 11:00 a.m. and 05:00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023 (previously Section 41-A of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, [(2014) 8 SCC 273] scrupulously. However, the petitioners/accused Nos.1 & 2 shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and producing all relevant documents/material required for the purpose of investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same and complete the investigation strictly in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________

JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA Dt.20.11.2025 ysk THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15283 of 2025 Dated:20.11.2025 ysk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top