SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 10095

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
B. Siva Sankara Rao, J
J.Purushottam – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

The petitioner in the present revision is accused in C.C.No.31 of 2018 on the file of the Special Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar, which case was renumbered from C.C.No.717 of 2017.

2. The 2nd respondent is the complainant therein. It is for the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act outcome of private complaint for dishonour of the cheque for Rs.15,00,000/- No.783255 dated 17.6.2017 from the issuance of statutory notice and from failure to pay and from accrual of cause of action, and after perusal and from the sworn statement taken cognizance and accused put-forth his appearance and it is while under trial, the accused filed the petition in Crl.M.P.No.1489 of 2018 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act , with a prayer to send the pro-note dated 25.11.2014 and the cheque supra to the CFSL, Hyderabad to determine and ascertain the age in respect of the signatures of the petitioner/accused and the two documents. The learned Magistrate by the impugned order dated 24.8.2018, after contest, dismissed the same. Present revision impugnedment is against that.

Heard both sides and perused the material on record.

3. Before coming to the petition and the scope with reference to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top