SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 22341

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
The State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Savlaram Bishnoi – Respondent
CRLP 12355/2025



##PAGE1##

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.12355, 12356 & 12357 OF 2025

29.12.2025

CRL.P.No.12355 of 2025 :

Between :

The State of Telangana

Through the Station House Officer,

TG Anti Narcotic Bureau,

Hyderabad, rep., by the

Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana,

Hyderabad 500 066

… Petitioner/Respondent

And

Savlaram Bishnoi

… Respondent/A.1

CRL.P.No.12356 of 2025 :

Between :

The State of Telangana

Through the Station House Officer,

TG Anti Narcotic Bureau,

Hyderabad, rep., by the

Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana,

Hyderabad 500 066

… Petitioner/Respondent

And

Hapura Bishnoi

… Respondent/A.2

##PAGE2##

- 2 -

CRL.P.No.12357 of 2025 :

Between :

The State of Telangana

Through the Station House Officer,

TG Anti Narcotic Bureau,

Hyderabad, rep., by the

Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana,

Hyderabad 500 066

… Petitioner/Respondent

And

Lalaram Bishnoi

… Respondent/A.3

: COMMON ORDER :

These criminal petitions are filed under section 483 (2) &

528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by the Public

Prosecutor praying this Court to cancel the bail granted to

respondents/A.1 to A.3 respectively in Cr.No.4 of 2025 of

Narcotic Police Station, Hyderabad TG Anti Narcotic Bureau,

Hyderabad, in Crl.M.P.No.4194 of 2025, Crl.M.P.No.4195 of

2025 and 4464 of 2025 on 22.08.2025 and 01.09.2025 by the

II-Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

2. Heard Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the petitioners in all the criminal

petitions and Sri G. Santosh Reddy, learned counsel appearing

##PAGE3##

- 3 -

for the respondent in Crl.P.No.12355 of 2025 and

Crl.P.No.12357 of 2025.

3. The contention of learned Additional Public Prosecutor is

that the seized contraband is 3.250 Kgs of Opium Afeem which

is a commercial quantity, but the trial Court without taking into

consideration of the said aspect granted bail to the accused.

There is no observation in the impugned orders that twin

conditions are satisfied as laid down under Section 37 of NDPS

Act. A.1 is a part of larger Opium drug syndicate and he along

with his brother A.4 procured Opium (Afeem) from A.5 in

Rajasthan and transported it to Hyderabad and with the

assistance of A.2 and A.3 he supplied the drug to absconding

accused A.6 to A.9 and distributed to various individuals.

Therefore, the bail granted by the trial Court is without any

reasons and simply recorded that A.1 to A.3 are in jail from

18.07.2025 and that material part of investigation is completed.

As such, prayed this Court to cancel the bail granted to A.1 to

A.3 by the trial Court.

4. The learned counsel for respondents/A.1 and A.3

submitted that the Narcotics Police illegally detained the

accused from 15.07.2025 to 18.07.2025. On 19.07.2025, they

fabricated a false narrative and remanded the accused to

judicial custody. It was alleged that the police planted drugs

##PAGE4##

- 4 -

and created a fabricated confession-cum-seizure panchanama,

falsely claiming the accused were apprehended at Bowenpally.

On 18.07.2025, the police allegedly took the accused from their

lockup, along with LWs 1 to 5 and LW-14, in police vehicles to

Safe Xpress X Road, Bowenpally. There, they staged a scene,

brought in LW-7 and LW-8 as panch witnesses, and recorded a

video as if the accused had just been apprehended. Before the

recording, the police allegedly coached the accused on what to

say. After the video recording, the police took the accused to

Kompally, placed a Brezza car bearing No. GJ 27 CM 1598 at

the location, took photographs, and then returned to the

Narcotics Police Station, Hyderabad. It was further submitted

that the delay in producing the accused before a Magistrate

amounts to illegal detention. The remand report shows false

date of arrest. In reality, the accused were apprehended on

15.07.2025 at the Gamjol Toll Plaza, Nirmal, while traveling

towards Hyderabad. CCTV footage from lanes 1 to 4 at the toll

plaza would confirm this. A writ petition was filed bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top